The Blakeley Group, Inc. Rotating Header Image

April 2014 – The job gains were entirely in the private sector

NOTE: Areas with blue text show the most recent market updates since the March Capital Highlights email.

“Save for gold, jewels, works of art, and perhaps good agricultural land, there is no such animal as a permanent investment.”
~ Bernard M. Baruch

The very big picture:

In the “decades” timeframe, we are in a Secular Bear Market which began in 2000 when the P/E ratio (using Shiller’s Cyclically-Adjusted P/E) peaked at about 44.  The job of Secular Bear markets is to burn off outrageously high P/E ratios over one or two decades, until finally the P/E ratio arrives back at a single-digit level, from which another Secular Bull Market can emerge.  See Fig. 1 for the 100-year view.

The Blakeley Group, Inc.

Figure 1

If history is a guide, we are not yet near the end of this Secular Bear Market.  The Shiller P/E  finished the week at 25.3, down slightly from the prior week’s 25.6. Even though P/E’s are now half what they were at their crazy peak in 2000, they are nonetheless at the high end of the normal range and leave little if any room for expansion.  This means that the stock market is unlikely to make gains greater than corporate profit growth percentage, if that.  (note: all P/E references are to the Shiller P/E values, sometimes called PE10 or CAPE, which are calculated so as to remove shorter-term fluctuations; see RobertShiller.com for details).

In fact, since 1881, the average annual returns for all ten year periods that began with a CAPE at this level have been just 3%/yr (see Fig. 2).

The Blakeley Group - Wealth Management

Figure 2

This further means that above-average returns will be much more likely to come from the active management of portfolios than from passive buy-and-hold.  Although a mania could come along and cause P/E’s to shoot upward from current levels (such as happened in the late 1920’s and the late 1990’s), in the absence of such a mania, buy-and-hold investors will likely have a long wait until the arrival of the next Secular Bull Market.

In the big picture:

The “big picture” is the months-to-years timeframe – the timeframe in which Cyclical Bulls and Bears operate.  The US Bull-Bear Indicator (see Fig. 3) is at 66., down a little from last week’s 66.9, and still solidly in cyclical Bull territory.  Early in the year, the US Bull-Bear Indicator pushed further into Bull territory than other global asset classes, reflecting the higher strength of the US relative to the rest of the world.  The current Cyclical Bull has taken the US to new all-time highs, finally exceeding the highs of 2007, but most of the world’s major indices have barely matched 2011’s highs, let alone approach 2007’s levels.

Wealth Management Silicon Valley

Figure 3

In the intermediate picture:

The intermediate (weeks to months) indicator (see Fig. 4) remains in positive status, ending the week at 27, up from the prior week’s 25. Separately, the quarter-by-quarter indicator – based on domestic and international stock trend status at the start of each quarter – gave a positive indication for the prospects for the first quarter of 2014.

Wealth Management Silicon Valley

Figure 4

Timeframe summary:

In the Secular (years to decades) timeframe (Figs. 1 & 2), the Secular Bear still is in force as the long-term valuation of the market is too high to sustain a new rip-roaring Secular Bull.  In the Cyclical (months to years) timeframe (Fig. 3), all major equity markets are in Cyclical Bull territory, with the US being far stronger than any other major market.  The Bond market returned to Cyclical Bull territory as of February 28th.  In the Intermediate (weeks to months) timeframe (Fig. 4), US equity markets remain in positive status.  The quarter-by-quarter indicator gave a positive signal for the 2nd quarter:  both US and International equities were in uptrends at the start of Q2, which signals a higher likelihood of an up quarter than a down quarter.

In the markets:

The month of March marked a literal turning point for the markets: investors turned away from previous high-flyers and turned toward more value-oriented opportunities.  The two indices that had led the market higher before mid-March, the Nasdaq and Russell 2000 Small Cap indices, were sold hard and turned in negative performances for the month (although each retained a slight gain for the quarter).  Companies whose names had been in the financial news daily for their skyrocketing share prices had the stuffing beaten out of them in the final days of the quarter.  Netflix, Tesla, Priceline, Amazon, Twitter, Facebook as well as a host of biotechs were sold down 20% to 40% from their highs reached just a few weeks ago.

For the first quarter, all US indices were higher save for the Dow Industrials, down less than a percent.  The Nasdaq and SmallCap indices finished the quarter well off their highs, and only slightly positive for the quarter.  The S&P 500 at +1.3% and MidCaps at +2.7% were the only US indices to finish the quarter with gains of more than 1%.

In a reversal from last year’s underperformance, Canada’s TSX index smartly outperformed the US for the first quarter, turning in a +5% gain.  Canada’s gains were largely driven by gains in natural resources (energy and metals), and Canada has not experienced the whirlwind rotation that has roiled the US markets.

Developed International experienced a slight loss for March at -0.5%, and a slight win for the first quarter at +0.2%.  Continuing the “first shall be worst” theme, Japan – the biggest developed market gainer of 2013 – dropped -9% in the first quarter.  Emerging International was the beneficiary of the rotation to value, as P/E multiples in Emerging Markets have been the most attractive in the world so far this year.  The sudden rush to Emerging Markets in March resulted in a +3.9% gain for the month.  Even that gain, added to a similar gain in February, was not enough to get to positive territory for the quarter, however, and Emerging Markets finished the quarter at -1.9% but rapidly rising.

For the week, which contained the first 4 market days of April, markets were generally but modestly positive.  Exceptions on the downside were the Nasdaq, hit with more selling of previous high-flyers, and on the upside were many countries in the Emerging Markets group, continuing their sudden outperformance.  Brazil, in particular, shone among the Emerging Markets with a +3% gain for the week.

US economic news was dominated by the Non-Farm Payrolls (“NFP”) report on Friday.  It was neither hot nor cold, at 192,000, but it did mark one milestone:  all the 8.8 million jobs lost in the recession have now been recovered albeit in painfully slow fashion.  Interest rates dropped lower on the NFP news, in anticipation that the Fed’s easy money policy would not be threatened by such a tepid number.  The job gains were entirely in the private sector, as government hiring was nil for the month.  Janet Yellen, backpedaling from her unguarded “6 months or so” comment of two weeks ago, said more reassuringly that the “economy needs extraordinary support for some time”.

Statistics Canada reported a surprising 42,900 job gain for March.  This was received positively by Canadian markets and currency, even though the number was not all it seemed.  First, 30,100 of the jobs were part-time, and second the vast majority – 39,300 – were public sector government jobs while only a tiny 3,600 were in the private sector. Nonetheless, the Loonie rose to its highest level in six weeks.

In the Eurozone, central bankers are newly fixated on their surprising inability to nudge inflation to their targeted 2% level.  Reported at just +0.5% annualized for March, this low level is too close to deflation for comfort, and Mario Draghi reassured the market that the European Central Bank would use both conventional and unconventional means to try to muscle inflation to a more comfortable higher level.  Deflation is already evident at the wholesale level, as the Producer Price Index was reported at -1.7% year-over-year through February.

(sources: Reuters, Barron’s, Wall St Journal, Bloomberg.com, ft.com, guggenheimpartners.com, ritholtz.com, markit.com, financialpost.com, Eurostat, Statistics Canada, Yahoo! Finance, stocksandnews.com)

Wealth Management Silicon Valley

Figure 5

The ranking relationship (shown in Fig. 5) between the defensive SHUT sectors (“S”=Staples [a.k.a. consumer non-cyclical], “H”=Healthcare, “U”=Utilities and “T”=Telecom) and the offensive DIME sectors  (“D”=Discretionary [a.k.a. Consumer Cyclical], “I”=Industrial, “M”=Materials, “E”=Energy), is one way to gauge institutional investor sentiment in the market.

The average ranking of Defensive SHUT sectors stayed at 11.8, the same as the prior week, while the average ranking of Offensive DIME sectors rose to 13 from the proir week’s 15.3 (mostly due to gains in the “E” of DIME – Energy. The Defensive SHUT sectors still have a slight lead over the Offensive DIME sectors.

Note: these are “ranks”, not “scores”, so smaller numbers are higher and larger numbers are lower.

Summary:

The US led the recovery from 2011’s travails, and is the strongest among all global markets.  However, the over-arching Secular Bear Market remains in place even as prior all-time highs are reached.

Because we are still in a Secular Bear, we have no expectations of runs of multiple double-digit consecutive years, and we expect poor market conditions to be a frequent occurrence.  Nonetheless, we remain completely open to any eventuality that the market brings, and our strategies, tactics and tools will help us to successfully navigate whatever happens.

About The Blakeley Group, Inc.:

At The Blakeley Group, we understand that every client has unique needs for wealth management. The same systematic approach will not work for everyone. That’s why we pride ourselves on taking a customized, solution-focused approach to each client’s financial situation.

Call us today to discuss your wealth management options.

We are here to help you develop a plan to meet your goals.

(408) 459-4913